Dear Dave I think you've done an very good job of this. Thanks a lot. I have a couple more points:
* There are separate rules for defects at http://cfconventions.org/errors.html. I think these need updating too. In the paragraph beginning "If someone thinks" we perhaps now need to distinguish "defect" and "bug". * I would argue that we need only the bug, defect and enhancement labels at https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/labels. An asciidoctor mod is a bug, I'd say, being typographical. I don't know what "duplicate" is. The others ("help wanted", "invalid", "question") are matters to be raised on the email list, not GitHub. I believe the plan is just to replace Trac with GitHub for managing the document, not to provide an alternative venue to the email list for discussing CF - right? In point 4 of the general guidelines you mention "typos", not "bugs". David is moderating this discussion, I believe. If we're following the usual rules, he should summarise the state of the discussion, and if no-one says anything more for three weeks, it's a done deal. However, David is on holiday this week, and I think next week. Sorry about that. Best wishes Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/130#issuecomment-409226679
