I agree. On the outstanding issues: 1. Trac in parallel? I think we are already in a phase where it is being used in parallel. The goal should be to shut it down, but as I've argued in the past, it may be too much to require a sharp transition. 2. I really think we should try using one repository and the email list. The cleanest solution would seem to be to migrate trac tickets to a new repository and bring the git commit history from https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions into it. From that point forward, https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions would be deprecated and all new work would take place in the new repository. I think that naming shouldn't be a problem. The new repo could be `cf-convention` or `cfconventions` or maybe we could just swap the names? 3. I would like to suggest that the conformance document be a separate issue all together.
-- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/130#issuecomment-403968417
