@JonathanGregory thanks for your input. Understand about the scope. I will create a new issue to handle my third point regarding communication/feedback pathways for contributors.
Regarding the other two suggestions I made, if additional linkages between the Rules page and CONTRIBUTING.md are in the works, that will help. I would still suggest expanding the scope here to include some edits to README.md to address the process of making contributions, whether they be links back to the Rules page or to CONTRIBUTING.md. My recommendation would be just to add a header and paragraph titled 'Making Contributions to the CF Conventions' or something like that. As is, the README still seems to be a little lacking as a front page about what the repo is and how users should interact with it. It is the first place everyone will look, after all. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/257#issuecomment-635948402 This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
