Dear @davidhassell I have changed the text about `nlayer` as you suggest. Thanks for the correction.
I propose that we should keep `nsigma` because removing it would be backward-incompatible, in the sense that existing data created with previous versions of the convention would be invalid in the new version. That sounds like an unnecessary nuisance, so the next best thing is to check that there isn't an inconsistency. Best wishes Jonathan -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/314*issuecomment-827561933__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!nh8v3J4J-cE-Iduo5ClLKyGQWc84kOGJC56lr42PZa5GvDW3cnA1zWxxerGQqu-IGwTGOrnaRY0$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from cf-metad...@cgd.ucar.edu, although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to cf-metadata-unsubscribe-requ...@listserv.llnl.gov.
