Hello - the 20th May is here, and no further comments have arisen. Thanks to all for the interesting discussion - and especially to @johnwilkin for the excellent diagrams.
Before we merge, however, it is noteworthy that this issue has identified and corrected a fundamental flaw in the conventions (as opposed to a typographical error, for example), which I'm not sure has happened before. The [rules](https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://cfconventions.org/rules.html__;!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gMKxGr_7okqq-Pz4q2b5IyxMPX_wksNE2xQB8uuKNvnK5f8IT2UZ1LPFhT_cY1pnaqnn7fVInmY$ ) on this state _The flawed version will be deprecated by a statement in the standard document and the conformance document. However, any data written with the flawed version will not be invalidated, although it may be problematic for users._ I am not sure in what form such a statement should take, or in where in the conventions document it should live. In any case, perhaps it should be considered as part PR #317? @JonathanGregory - do you agree the PR should be amended in this way? If so, would you like to propose some extra text? Many thanks, David -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/314*issuecomment-844145910__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!gMKxGr_7okqq-Pz4q2b5IyxMPX_wksNE2xQB8uuKNvnK5f8IT2UZ1LPFhT_cY1pnaqnn6eaOTLg$ This list forwards relevant notifications from Github. It is distinct from [email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list. To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to [email protected].
