yes, ``calculational_precision`` was a mistake; I prefer 
``computational_precision``.  Also I'd be happy with not referring to an 
external standard, and for now, just suggesting that two values, "decimal32" 
and "decimal64", are supported, unless someone thinks others are needed at this 
time.

-- 
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://urldefense.us/v3/__https://github.com/cf-convention/cf-conventions/issues/327*issuecomment-840687587__;Iw!!G2kpM7uM-TzIFchu!mMqPZXX-ORN68YMGfOYD2JcwfTu8Cjj3Pr99bWCImzH-psB_8t2NqS3uL0bxrb7e3VuxsHkjf9Y$
 
This list forwards relevant notifications from Github.  It is distinct from 
[email protected], although if you do nothing, a subscription to the 
UCAR list will result in a subscription to this list.
To unsubscribe from this list only, send a message to 
[email protected].

Reply via email to