Very greatly appreciated! Thanks,
Howie --- On Friday, April 01, 2005 4:51 PM, Ben Rogers scribed: --- > > We used the first method. We tested 3 of the values (low, mid and > high). We found that they all had the same impact on performance. So, > as per the recommendation in the article, we used the lowest number > (8192). One page in particular went from average of 18 seconds to 3 > seconds. That page returns a product list that is about 400k in size. > In general, it seemed that the > larger the page, the bigger the performance hit without that setting. > > Ben Rogers > http://www.c4.net > v.508.240.0051 > f.508.240.0057 > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Find out how CFTicket can increase your company's customer support efficiency by 100% http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=49 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:10:5319 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/10 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:10 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=11502.10531.10 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
