On Friday, July 26, 2002, at 07:29 , Alex Hubner wrote: > Sean, your comments regarding "CFMX versus CF5" are very sensate. I > must confess that I agree with most of then.
That's good since I hardly used CF5 - I always worry I'm on shaky ground there. I started using CF about August last year and jumped onto early builds of Neo almost immediately. So I'm used to CFMX but not very familiar with CF5 (although I ran both side by side for about six months I guess). > No, I didn't tested it with trusted cache. I'll do it monday and post > the results/thoughts as soon as I can. I'll be interested to hear the results. If would be a real shame if all the Fusebox apps ran slower on CFMX than on CF5... > Tomorrow I'm going to the beach (hey, I live in Brazil!)... Tomorrow I'm going to a cat show (which is not uncommon for me). > My staging server runs Win2k Server, Athlon1.4 Gb/1024MB RAM/7.200rpm > IDE disks. Anyway, hardware is not an issue in this case. OK, just checking. "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
