On Friday, July 26, 2002, at 11:48 , Joe Eugene wrote: > CFMX faster 10%... BULLSHIT..sorry.... its friday night and i > cant stop bitching about CFMX... tests show really bad results.
As Todd said in another thread, instead of getting emotional, let's see if we can figure out why your code runs slowly on CFMX when, for many people, CFMX *is* much faster than CF5. > CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? Well, that's not necessarily a problem, as long as requests are being served appropriately. Macromedia's current web site is a mixture of Apache 1.3.x serving static content and Netscape Enterprise Server / BroadVision / Oracle serving dynamic content (as well as some applications on the former Allaire cluster). Having near 100% CPU utilization is not a problem on those machines - as long as response speeds are fast (which they are). A scheduler can easily take up near 100% CPU (depending on how it's written) but as long as it drops into the background while a request is processing, it'll still respond quickly. Throughput and response times are the important measures for web application systems, not CPU usage. "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
