On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 09:11 , Sean A Corfield wrote: > On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:31 , Joe Eugene wrote: >> MM's performance brief is probably based on optimized CFMX code >> and maybe optimized CF.50 code. > Nope. As far as I know it's the exact same code run on both CF5 and CFMX. > I will ask the QA lab to confirm this.
I have confirmed with the CF QA team that the tests were run on identical code. It was not optimized for a specific version of CF. Satisfied? "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
