On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 07:26 , Joe Eugene wrote: > Do you know of any internal WDDX implementation differences > between > CFMX and CF5.0 .. CFMX
Er, yes, it was written in C/C++ in CF5 and it's been rewritten in Java in CFMX. As has everything else. Read my lips Joe: CFMX is a complete rewrite. > What does #1 mean? I don't know. I don't use JavaScript with queries so I don't know what the behavior was or how it changed. > If WDDX data is Stored in a DB and output using custom tags.. is > there any internal CFMX > implementation that would degrade performance compared to CF5.0? Well, custom tag invocations are faster in CFMX than in CF5. I have no idea about WDDX. Do you *think* it is slower? Have you written a test case and *proved* there is a noticeable difference? Why don't you try it for yourself. Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood ______________________________________________________________________ Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
