> > OK, that sounds like good progress so maybe we'll all stop ragging on you > :) You havent given out any peformance tests.. other than MM Perf brief I am NOT sure...you guys have any performance test for the details we are talking about here...What can you expect from developers..?
> Well, it's apples and oranges... in CF5, WDDX2CFML was written in C/C++ > and now it's completely rewritten in Java. It's just... different code. I' > m not on the product team so I don't have access to the source. Repeated... no spec details given. This news was public.. in NEO/Beta releases. What would be good information is some like... (eg IIF scales differently in CFMX Vs CF5.0) SO the question is : Are there any changes/updates made to WDDX...in CFMX Vs CF5.0 (regardless of JAVA/C++ engine.. unicode)? that can possibly make it run slower (like the COM issue) yet Unknown(TESTING). Joe ----- Original Message ----- From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 2:17 PM Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources? > On Tuesday, July 30, 2002, at 08:54 , Joe Eugene wrote: > > I havent come to a final test result.. but i think we are > > narrowing > > it > > down to the Complex Object(WDDX) returned from the data store > > that gets parsed out WDDX2CFML.. > > OK, that sounds like good progress so maybe we'll all stop ragging on you > :) > > > Custom Tags are probably running ok/fast.. probably its the WDDX > > parsing..in CFMX that causes the CPU to run 80-90%... Atleast we > > are seeing a pattern here with tests. > > Hmm, interesting. That should be pretty easy to performance test. > > > Is it possible that you can find out.. > > How the Java Implementation of WDDX2CFML has changed in CFMX? > > Well, it's apples and oranges... in CF5, WDDX2CFML was written in C/C++ > and now it's completely rewritten in Java. It's just... different code. I' > m not on the product team so I don't have access to the source. > > > Any WDDX implementation changes(Not in docs) will be helpful. > > It's Unicode capable now - but that's just by virtue of it being > implemented in Java. As far as I know, there were no specific behavioral > changes (except what's in the release notes etc). > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." > -- Margaret Atwood > > ______________________________________________________________________ This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for dependable ColdFusion Hosting. FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
