Sean,
Do you know of any internal WDDX implementation differences between
CFMX and CF5.0 .. CFMX Docs say
1.New in ColdFusion MX: ColdFusion preserves the case of column names in
JavaScript. (Earlier releases converted query column names to
lowercase.) (Does this mean "JavaScript" type casing?)
2.New in ColdFusion MX: This tag supports several encoding formats. The
default encoding format is UTF-8. The tag interoperates with Unicode.
What does #1 mean?
If WDDX data is Stored in a DB and output using custom tags.. is
there any internal CFMX
implementation that would degrade performance compared to CF5.0?
Thanks
Joe
----- Original Message -----
From: "Sean A Corfield" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 30, 2002 9:26 AM
Subject: Re: CFMX Taking all CPU Resources?
> On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 09:11 , Sean A Corfield wrote:
> > On Monday, July 29, 2002, at 07:31 , Joe Eugene wrote:
> >> MM's performance brief is probably based on optimized CFMX code
> >> and maybe optimized CF.50 code.
> > Nope. As far as I know it's the exact same code run on both CF5 and
CFMX.
> > I will ask the QA lab to confirm this.
>
> I have confirmed with the CF QA team that the tests were run on identical
> code. It was not optimized for a specific version of CF. Satisfied?
>
> "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
> -- Margaret Atwood
>
>
______________________________________________________________________
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
