That's a pretty good rule of thumb. As for CFMX...We've focused on using it for new projects...where any issues that come up along the way would be easier to squash.
As for opening an incident...they won't charge u if it's a bug. Happened twice for us...seems pretty fair. Stace -----Original Message----- From: Dave Wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 9:38 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: LONG time CF Supporter - About ready to dump CF! >I should also add. Someone once told me some good advice, always wait >for the first dot release. Come to think of it , I'm sure CF has had >problems like this in the past was it 4.0 to 4.5 I cant remember but I >remember one of the releases was a nightmare. Yes this is good advice and I personally took the launch of the Updater as an equivalent to a service pack. Hence my starting eval of CFMX at this stage. The previous versions all had their problems, yes and I believe you are referring to 4.5 which was a little more troublesome than most previous releases. I didn't upgrade to 4.5 until 4.52 was available. The problems being faced by CFMX are very different due in part to CFMX itself being a ground up rewrite on a new Java platform. Dave ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm
