Yes, BlueDragon for .NET is completely implemented as CLI-based managed code (well...there is a little unmanaged C++ code in there, but that's also true for the Java version of BlueDragon, and for CFMX).
It's not clear at this point that we're going to support <cfobject type="java"> in BlueDragon for .NET. It's technically possible, but if you want to use Java objects, why not run the Java version? Similarly, BlueDragon for .NET will support <cfobject type=".net"> to access CLI-based objects written in C#, Visual Basic.NET, etc.; of course, the Java version of BlueDragon won't support this. Vince Bonfanti New Atlanta Communications, LLC http://www.newatlanta.com > -----Original Message----- > From: webguy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 1:21 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CF - PHP comparisons? > > > > BlueDragon for .NET will be fully integrated with the .NET > Framework, > > and COM will work very well. BlueDragon will support CFCs > and other MX > > functionality, and beyond. It > will > > be more than a satisfactory solution--you will be delighted. > > I persume that it will be the same as any CLI object.. > > What will <cfobject type="java" ..> performance be like? > > > wg > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
