On Monday, Feb 24, 2003, at 08:20 US/Pacific, John Paul Ashenfelter 
wrote:
> This is the actual issue I *was* talking about. All the really good FB
> developer I've worked with *have* modded the core file. And it's
> encouraged -- look at Hal's whitepaper on adding fbx_permissions for 
> his
> CF_Secure tag. Or John and Hal building FuseQ. Or Nat and Erik adding
> error-trapping to FEX. Or the new work for "FBMX".

One of the key differentiators with FBMX is that you should not need to 
modify the core files to add extensions. FBMX has a Plug-In 
architecture (last time I looked at it) that allows you to simply write 
your own CFCs and extend the stub CFCs provided by FBMX. Then you 
register your plug-ins in the XML configuration file for the 
application.

I'm just disappointed that so little public information has appeared 
about FBMX and how slow development seems to be of this new version. 
I've offered to help but so far it appears to be Hal's solo project...

Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/

"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to