> -----Original Message----- > From: Barney Boisvert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, February 21, 2003 12:30 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX > > > I have to disagree with this opinion. As I see it, there are two major > 'types' of fusebox: normal and fuseQ.
And the rest of the sliced and diced versions that deviate from the norm that is Fusebox "methodology". I was speaking of the ability to troubleshoot an app that is part Fusebox, part Bob's Great Idea To Modify This Section Over Here, for whatever reason. My point was that a mode of thinking is in place for people who use Fusebox when they encounter a bastardized Fusebox app, and I think that mode is just as hard to overcome as it is to look at an app that is written without Fusebox and troubleshoot it. --Andy ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4 FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
