Yeah, I agree. I'm so sick of the divisions.  Mac vs PC, Microsoft vs The
Word, Java vs .NET, my programming language can beat up your programming
language.

I say: The right tool for the right job.

I don't consider myself a Cfer, .NETer, ASPer, Microsft or Java bigot.  I'm
just a programmer and I'll use what I'm able to.

Except for netscape browsers--those suck ass.

:)




----- Original Message -----
From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 4:03 PM
Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX


> Fregas said:
> "One thing that fusebox did that has nothing to do with any particular
> methodology is it taught me how to best structure a web application.  It
> taught me more about custom tags, application & session variables,
cfmodule,
> naming conventions, logical organization of modules, etc.  I think that's
> one benefit with fusebox for new CFers is it forces them to use some
> features in CF and architecture that they might have avoided but aren't
> exclusive to fusebox by any means.
>
> I think that as long as you're using some kind of methodology and that you
> write clean modularized code, you are in good shape.  You don't need
fusebox
> to do this, but it helps if you haven't done this before."
>
> Ya I think that nails it....great for green CFers that don't get exposure
to
> the (and don't flame me for saying this) "real" side of web application
> development as opposed to just something written in CF.  Of course
> ultimately if you write your code properly then anyone should be able to
> understand it and it should be constructed so that updates and additions
> work with minimal hassle etc. etc. blah blah blah
>
> Wow...could we be heading towards the bright shiny light of FBers and
> regular CFers coming together in peace and understanding ;-)
>
> Great points today folks...much more productive than the usual FB vs.no FB
> mud slingin!
>
> Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> t. 250.920.8830
> e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Macromedia Associate Partner
> www.macromedia.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------
> Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
> Founder & Director
> www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Fregas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 1:47 PM
> Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX
>
>
> > Bryan,
> >
> > I started with just plain old vanilla cf.  I hadn't done any web
> > programming, only a little VB5-6 and some basic and pascal years
earlier,
> so
> > I was a pretty green programmer.
> >
> > Well, as I mentioned we had done some terrible things to our CFML code:
> many
> > levels of nested includes, copying and pasting of code such as queries
and
> > display logic, etc.  Once I heard about fusebox it took me a while to
get
> a
> > feel for it, but when I understood it, it helped tremendously.
> >
> > One thing that fusebox did that has nothing to do with any particular
> > methodology is it taught me how to best structure a web application.  It
> > taught me more about custom tags, application & session variables,
> cfmodule,
> > naming conventions, logical organization of modules, etc.  I think
that's
> > one benefit with fusebox for new CFers is it forces them to use some
> > features in CF and architecture that they might have avoided but aren't
> > exclusive to fusebox by any means.
> >
> > I think that as long as you're using some kind of methodology and that
you
> > write clean modularized code, you are in good shape.  You don't need
> fusebox
> > to do this, but it helps if you haven't done this before.
> >
> > Craig
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Bryan Stevenson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:39 PM
> > Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX
> >
> >
> > > Couldn't have said it better myself Michael
> > >
> > > Do what works for you and your projects ;-)
> > >
> > > I still wouldn't mind hearing from the FBers out there....
> > >
> > > Did you start CF with FB or pickup FB along the way?
> > >
> > > Bryan Stevenson B.Comm.
> > > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development
> > > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc.
> > > t. 250.920.8830
> > > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > > Macromedia Associate Partner
> > > www.macromedia.com
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------
> > > Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group
> > > Founder & Director
> > > www.cfug-vancouverisland.com
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Michael Wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 12:40 PM
> > > Subject: RE: FBX3 AND CFMX
> > >
> > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Actually, I totally understand where you're coming from. I wasn't
> trying
> > > > to imply that Fusebox is better, because for some people it
certainly
> is
> > > > not. And, you are right--A methodology is supposed to make
development
> > > > smoother; or at least more standardized. If it doesn't then you
> > > > shouldn't use it. Given that Fusebox has been through so many
changes
> > > > and because there are now several hybrids available that address
many
> of
> > > > the issues developers have faced in the past, I was simply
suggesting
> > > > that you re-test the waters to determine if the workaround issues
you
> > > > are concerned with still exist.
> > > >
> > > > In any case, you seem to be very comfortable and productive within
> your
> > > > own methodology; that is all that truly counts. :)
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > > MW
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 3:21 PM
> > > > To: CF-Talk
> > > > Subject: Re: FBX3 AND CFMX
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Nope..ya missed my point....CFMX migration was just an example.
> > > > but now we're heading towards what's better ;-)
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=4
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=4
FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq
This list and all House of Fusion resources hosted by CFHosting.com. The place for 
dependable ColdFusion Hosting.

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
                                

Reply via email to