Google.
Maybe we should discuss the semantics of "object" as that is clearly the
hangup :P
Thanks Matt,
I know, I know I'm keeping this thread going, just too funny.
Kevin
-----Original Message-----
From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 3:30 PM
To: CF-Talk
Subject: Re: OOP Definition - Its a matter of semantics and we all know wh
at he means
While many may debate what OOP means to them, there is an accepted
definition within the computer science field. Gotta love academics...
http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?object-oriented+programming
<http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?object-oriented+programming>
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com <http://www.MontaraSoftware.com>
On Jan 7, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Kevin Marino wrote:
> Though, its been fun following the OOP "definition" thread, I offer the
> final end of this
>
>
> Google the following : definition of "object oriented programming"
>
>
> Pick your personal favorite. I like "Web Definition" and webopedia
> definition. By those 2 def.
>
>
> 'nough said.
>
>
> Greets
> Kevin
>
>
> PS. Props to Adam for the nicely done acronym
> SJOCSOCPSAYBNVFTSMFOWHYSADALYAHTMLC
>
>
> Kevin
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
