> say
>
> http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/oopl_body.html
>
Granted I only skimmed the document, but it didn't seem to be
presenting a definition as to what OOP is. It seemed to be more focused
on OO languages. Of course, if you are citing that document to back up
your position then I think you need to reread it. Specifically, the
following.
"Both object-oriented and non-object-oriented applications can be
written in either traditional languages or OOPLs. To fully realize the
benefits of an object orientation, it is much easier to write the
implementations in languages especially designed for OO programming."
-Matt
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
