CS. Considering it was CS PhDs that introduced us to OOP in the first
place, I'm inclined to agree with the widely accepted definition they
use.
Matt Liotta
Montara Software, Inc.
http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
On Jan 7, 2004, at 3:57 PM, Tim Hanbey wrote:
> Depends on who accepts the definition.. If it was widely accepted,
> there
> wouldn't be a debate.
>
> Matt Liotta wrote:
>
> > While many may debate what OOP means to them, there is an accepted
> > definition within the computer science field. Gotta love academics...
> >
> >http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?object-
> oriented+programming
> >
> > Matt Liotta
> > Montara Software, Inc.
> >http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Kevin Marino wrote:
> >
> > > Though, its been fun following the OOP "definition" thread, I
> offer the
> > > final end of this
> > >
> > >
> > > Google the following :��definition of��"object oriented
> programming"���
> > >
> > >
> > > Pick your personal favorite. I like "Web Definition" and webopedia
> > > definition. By those 2 def.
> > >
> > >
> > > 'nough said.
> > >
> > >
> > > Greets
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
> > > PS. Props to Adam for the nicely done acronym
> > > SJOCSOCPSAYBNVFTSMFOWHYSADALYAHTMLC
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
