"Object-oriented (OO) applications can be written in either conventional languages or OOPLs, but they are much easier to write in languages especially designed for OO programming. "
- Calvin
----- Original Message -----
From: Tim Hanbey
To: CF-Talk
Sent: Wednesday, January 07, 2004 4:06 PM
Subject: Re: OOP Definition - Its a matter of semantics and we all know wh at he means
as an example
This is what the Carnegie Mellon Software Engineering Institute has to say
http://www.sei.cmu.edu/str/descriptions/oopl_body.html
Tim Hanbey wrote:
> Depends on who accepts the definition.. If it was widely accepted, there
> wouldn't be a debate.
>
> Matt Liotta wrote:
>
> > While many may debate what OOP means to them, there is an accepted
> > definition within the computer science field. Gotta love academics...
> >
> > http://wombat.doc.ic.ac.uk/foldoc/foldoc.cgi?object-oriented+programming
> >
> > Matt Liotta
> > Montara Software, Inc.
> > http://www.MontaraSoftware.com
> >
> > On Jan 7, 2004, at 3:21 PM, Kevin Marino wrote:
> >
> > > Though, its been fun following the OOP "definition" thread, I
> offer the
> > > final end of this
> > >
> > >
> > > Google the following : definition of "object oriented
> programming"
> > >
> > >
> > > Pick your personal favorite. I like "Web Definition" and webopedia
> > > definition. By those 2 def.
> > >
> > >
> > > 'nough said.
> > >
> > >
> > > Greets
> > > Kevin
> > >
> > >
> > > PS. Props to Adam for the nicely done acronym
> > > SJOCSOCPSAYBNVFTSMFOWHYSADALYAHTMLC
> > >
> > >
> > > Kevin
> > >
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
