> Writing an event gateway requires knowledge of Java therefore yours is not a
> valid argument.
True but using one of the out-of-the-box gateways does not nor will
using any 3rd party gateways that people write. The end result will be
access to a large number of protocols with no knowledge of Java
required - for example, my JMS gateway would allow any CF developer to
write a pure CF app that processed JMS XML messages with no knowledge
of Java at all.
> I bet more people are using their own authentication schemes than cflogin.
And I bet they're writing them all in pure CF - what's your point with
that analogy?
--
Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/
"If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive."
-- Margaret Atwood
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]
