On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:50 PM, Rob wrote:

> On Thu, 9 Sep 2004 20:14:44 -0700, Dick Applebaum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>  > On Sep 9, 2004, at 8:02 PM, Rob wrote:
>  >
>  > > > There have been rumors that Apple has an OS X that runs
> on��Intel
>  > > CPUs.
>  > >
>  > >��Not a rumor - http://www.opendarwin.org/
>  >
>  > Nah, I meant all of OS X -- including the GUI (more difficult
> because
>  > they would need to design vor more varied hardware options)
>
>  I first downloaded Darwin because I thought it came with the GUI -
>  when I found out it didn't I bought a Mac - so I think people would
>  buy it. I would've bought OSX for x86 instead of the G4 - so that one
>  sale would have sucked for apple (99��vs 1,200). For it to work I
>  think they need volume - whole companies moving their x86 boxes to OSX

No, I am not talking about invading Iceland -- rather invading Redmund

Here is an interesting article -- tho a little dated.

http://www.pbs.org/cringely/pulpit/pulpit20020214.html

>
>  > Darwin's good -- but if they are in for a penny they should be in
> for
>  > $$$
>
>  I hear you. My dad used to say, "are you in business to make a little
>  bit of money or a whole s**t load of money?"

Yeah, If Jobs has the stones -- and I think he does -- the stars are
coming into alignment

>
>  > >��>
>  > >��> What would be the acceptance if Apple released OS X Tiger on
> Intel,
>  > >��> Solaris, etc. Say 1Q 2005?
>  > >
>  > >��I think the main reason more people don't run apples is they are
>  > > expensive.
>  >
>  > I wasn't talking about buying an Apple computer -- I was asking if
> they
>  > would buy OS X to run on their current hardware
>
>  I personally think that the OSX GUI is better than Gnome, KDE, Icewm,
>  fluxbox, etc; I also think that OSX has a better usability creditably
>  then Linux desktops.

I agree ( except no experience with fluxbox?)

Noone does better than Apple on the UI -- and the UI is everything!

>  What I meant by the expensive thing is, in my
>  experience most developers who see the apple GUI comment��something
>  along the lines of "that's awesome" with a purchasing twinkle in their
>  eye - then they grab the price tag and walk away - if it was on x86
>  then that last part would be gone.

So, say Apple sells OS X Intel for $49 (while lowering the price to the
same level for OS X G4/5)

With a dual boot/execute (ala OS 9) option, you give up nothing and
have everything to gain.

>  So, yes I think people would buy it. Some would feel more comfortable
>  with an Apple backed x86 OS than say using a Red Hat desktop.

How about compared to a MS-backed x86 OS?

>
>  > >��> Could Apple grab the Linux/Unix desktop?
>  > >
>  > >��I don't think so only because Linux has more drivers for x86
> hardware
>  > >��then BSD (and therefore OSX)
>  >
>  > Can't they buy that capability?
>
>  From who? Some Linux drivers are GPL which would be right out. They
>  would have to port some LGPL over from Linux (minimal perhaps), or
>  convince the vendors to port their windows versions over to BSD (or
>  OSX if that part is different enough). I guess they could have a
>  smaller set of supported hardware, but to be effective it would have
>  to run on a wide array of systems and hardware I think.
>

don't know how to respond -- is is doab;e?

>  > >��does; however, if they would lower their
>  > >��prices on the Gs and ditch the "I am an artist therefore I use a
> Mac"
>  > >��image, I think they have a good chance at a larger desktop share.
>  >
>  > Again, I was not asking about hardware, just the OS
>
>  Yeah sorry about that - but I love my G4 :-D. The desktop is the bomb
>  whatever the hardware (today its just not available in x86)
>
>  > Good -- I'll find a polka for K
>  She'll like that now that she is running her little iMac and is in
>  love with iTunes - you've created another monster :-o
>

Good -- you don't deserve her, yet!

>  > (Haven't looked at the new cfEclipse yet, but sounds good)
>  tis
>
>  > P.S. Can you talk about not being in the Blackstone beta too -- or
> you
>  > one of the blessed?
>
>  I am not in the blackstone beta - I think macromedia fears me cause I
>  don't know when to shut it ;)
>

Me too!

Dick

>  Cheers
>
>  --
>  ~The cfml plug-in for eclipse~
>  http://cfeclipse.tigris.org
>  ~open source xslt IDE~
>  http://treebeard.sourceforge.net
>  ~open source XML database~
>  http://ashpool.sourceforge.net
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings] [Donations and Support]

Reply via email to