That may be your opinion, but the stark reality is that object-orientation has taken over the vast majority of the programming world. In my opinion, not embracing this change is basically career suicide.
On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:49:30 -0500, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Exact, and I would even add "that utilises NO OO technique, and it will even > be faster to develop, and perform even better. On Mon, 29 Nov 2004 13:49:30 -0500, Claude Schneegans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>that you can still develop CF Apps > in a timely menner without the use of FB or MACH II that do utilize > proper OO techniques... and that perform better, as well. > > Exact, and I would even add "that utilises NO OO technique, and it will even > be faster to develop, > and perform even better. > > I recently had to add some features in a FB application, it was including > more than 100 files and it took me hours to find the one I had to modify to > do the job. > This is how a good willing concept is finally having the oposite result it is > intended to. > > -- > _______________________________________ > REUSE CODE! Use custom tags; > See http://www.contentbox.com/claude/customtags/tagstore.cfm > (Please send any spam to this address: [EMAIL PROTECTED]) > Thanks. > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Gold Sponsor - CFHosting.net http://www.cfhosting.net Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:185562 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
