are u serious??? LMFAO!!! "we" don't use it as a standard, you may but surely don't include me wait till u start to make compliant wrbsites then say that.
its more like ppl use ie because they don't know any better or they don't know they have "better" choices. its funny u say this because i read an article where steve balmer said like a week ago that m$ wont add "enhancements" because their customers dont want them. WHich more than likely isnt the case, its more like they dont know that they can have a better browser experience without ie. I remember that i used to think that i would never use say, tabbed browsing..... until i tried it, now i cant live without it. ---------- Original Message ---------------------------------- From: "Andrew Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 16:37:26 +1100 >Not to mention that we use IE as a standard for our intranet systems we >design, why because NO other browser is capable of delivering the >content enhancements we need in the browser, and that is what will make >IE remain strong... > >Regards, >Andrew Scott > > >-----Original Message----- >From: mayo [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Monday, 6 December 2004 3:19 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: RE: SOT: Browser Stats (stirring the pot) > >I maintain / have access to the logs of about 15 sites. The commercial >and >financial ones all have MSIE above 92% and holding. The purely financial >ones are 95%+. > >The one pure art site (photography) has MSIE at 65%, and an awful lot of >unknowns. Mac O/S is about 25%. > >IE will remains strong until tech departments replace IE with Opera or >Firefox. The sad thing is I inadvertently help IE remain strong. I use >IE a >lot because I need to know how IE renders my client's sites. I love >using >Opera but I need to know how they view the web. The end result is my >usage >helps pad IE's numbers. > >Gilbert Midonnet >GLM Designs > > > > >-----Original Message----- >From: Sean Corfield [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >Sent: Sunday, December 05, 2004 9:55 PM >To: CF-Talk >Subject: Re: SOT: Browser Stats (stirring the pot) > > >Apache puts out a lot of security patches. Those don't get as much >press as IIS. I might be hard to say whether Apache or IIS gets more >patches. My gut feel is that Apache makes patches available faster >than Microsoft does for IIS but, again, no hard evidence on my part... > >On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 18:05:47 -0800, Rob <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> That whole "its used more so there is more exploits for it" argument >> is one of those ones I just ignore. Apache is the most used web >> server, but there are far more IIS exploits - why... because Apache is >> better software. > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Special thanks to the CF Community Suite Silver Sponsor - New Atlanta http://www.newatlanta.com Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:186274 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
