Thanks! In an entirely different Structure/Cached Query application
comparison from the one where I earlier today posted the code here,
I'm seeing Structures are still 15% slower.
Dave Watts opined here that he didn't believe there really was a
limit to how many queries CF would cache, the CF Administrator/Settings
Statement that:
"The maximum number of cached queries allowed at any given time is 100."
notwithstanding. (I notice CF4.0.1 accepted my limit of 9999 but not
10000. Is there a message here?)
So IF the CF limit on Cached Queries is not limiting to your application,
and IF Cached Queries are faster than Structures, then it's starting to
look like Structure NYET, Cached SI. NO?
I guess it's possible in a very active site for Cached Queries to require
more ram then Structures. This consideration might require monitoring to
establish the appropriate timeout for the Cached Queries.
Anyone?
best, paul
At 11:18 AM 8/31/00 -0500, you wrote:
>Cool work Paul. This is valuable stuff to most of us. I am interested in
>keeping posted on your findings.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
