Which is less efficient? I re-ran my test with <CFIF PAGES IS "C"> and saw no statistically significant difference. best, paul At 12:48 PM 8/31/00 -0400, you wrote: >Also I notice from the structure version you use ><CFIF >APPLICATION.YPS["#Class_ID#"]["Pages"] IS "C"> > >and then in the Query version you use > ><CFIF PAGES EQ "C"> > >Also this is known to be a less effecient method >of String comparison in CF. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
- Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Cameron Childress
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Andy Peterson
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Jeremy Allen
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Billy Cravens
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Nilufer
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Rick Osborne
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? dougn
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Hinojosa, Robert

