In my case it is fair, since I'm only
interested in reads. Structures are
widely touted as a way to store a DB
in memory to speed things up. I was
surprised to find results that suggested
a cached query was faster.
BTW, note that if this result is valid,
it means stored procedures are less
important for reads.
best, paul
At 12:48 PM 8/31/00 -0400, you wrote:
>And since Cached queries are read only
>is it even really fair to compare the two
>given how easy it is to set and work with
>a structure and the somewhat more limiting
>nature of cached queries?
Paul Smith, Web/Database Droid
A: SupportNet, Inc, 3871 Piedmont Ave, Oakland, CA 94611
P: (510) 763-2358
C: (510) 205-6755
F: (510) 763-2370
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://www.support.net
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
To Unsubscribe visit
http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
