No. I was referring to eliminating CFSETs at the output stage to set dummy variables and using variables with Structure syntax instead. That is, eliminating steps like: <CFSET ClassID = APPLICATION.YPS["#Class_ID#"]> changed the Structure method to be only 15% slower instead of 26% slower. best, paul At 12:48 PM 8/31/00 -0400, you wrote: >You mentioned eliminating CFSET's >is that the actually initalization >of the structures? ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_talk or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
- Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Cameron Childress
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Andy Peterson
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Jeremy Allen
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Billy Cravens
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- Re: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Nilufer
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? Rick Osborne
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? paul smith
- RE: Structures No? Cached Queries Yes? dougn

