S.Isaac Dealey wrote: >>Ack! Strawman argument! You're picking on a "weakness" of >>English rather >>actually arguing about whether pluralisation is a good >>thing or not. > > How about this: If you like to have singular named class names, the > name of the class matches the name of the table and as a result can be > automated. I.e. address.cfc matches the address table, contact.cfc > matches the contact table and addendum.cfc matches the addendum table. > > If plural table names are used, there isn't consistency and as a > result, class names must also be plural or there can be no automation > between the class and the table.
That is a red herring. K. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:200918 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
