i use it and its great, fast, stable, seems so far to be way more stable then even 6.1 or 5 ever was.
no offense but to me it sounds like your troubles are gunna start with the the actual code (ask someone from myspace about this hahah) CFMX7 is a completely different beast then the prehistoric cfm5. I'm working on a project now running on 5 (redoing into cfmx7) and my gawd the code back then was like "earth to ground control...." My advise would be to looki into properly optimizing your server and then go back and get your code up to date. ~Dave the disruptor~ "Some people just don't appreciate how difficult it is to dispense wisdom and abuse at the same time." ---------------------------------------- From: dan martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, October 21, 2005 7:30 PM To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> Subject: anyone using mx7 in production? It seems to be quite unstable compared to 5.0. The performance also seems to be worse, not better. Is anyone using this in a production environment? I have migrated from 5.0 and am starting to regret that decision. There seems to be an endless list of problems with performance and tags just not working. The jre crashes seem to happen when there is the slightest load. In 5.0 it used to slow the user doing the long request. Now it seems to kill everyone. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Logware (www.logware.us): a new and convenient web-based time tracking application. Start tracking and documenting hours spent on a project or with a client with Logware today. Try it for free with a 15 day trial account. http://www.houseoffusion.com/banners/view.cfm?bannerid=67 Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:221894 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
