Michael E. Carluen wrote: > Agree with you Tom. Even if you may not find a need of packaged frameworks, > I'm sure we all operate on our own pseudo- coding structure. Something that > makes the code predictable to the next guy, yet still being fluid and > flexible as we need it to be. Often, I think rigidity of frameworks often > goes on the way of creativity.
well sure, a lot of my apps are very similar, so I suppose I have my own "framework" but when I revamped Galleon into CFMBB, you could say that I adopted the Raymond Camden framework =) With all the enhancements and changes I've made, I'm still doing things the same way he did. Which is really my point. good developers can code in whatever way they need to. If I had to take over maintenance of a fusebox app, I'm pretty sure the learning curve wouldn't be very much, cuz it's all still CFML. rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:240367 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
