DAMN I AM NOTTTTTTTTTT PEOPLE GET IT STRAIGHT!!!!!!!
I HAVE SAID I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT MILLISECONDS BUT WHEN ITS NOTICABLE TO THE FRICKIN NAKED EYE THEN ITS MORE THAN A FEW MILLISECONDS DIFFERENCE AND IT IS A PROBLEM. When people have to wait and the competitors site is faster then they leave, it aint fricking rocket science. "If milliseconds are so important to the customer, you're doing a disservice to them currently." If you are charging then close the the same amount and making it easier on you and slower to the customers then thats a disservice to the client. No wonder why i win almost everything i bid for, if you guys are explaining it to the client like that lol. ~Dave the disruptor~ ---------------------------------------- From: "Zaphod Beeblebrox" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 11:38 PM To: CF-Talk <[email protected]> Subject: Re: Fusebox 4 Slow? dave, you keep saying this, but then won't explain why you're coding in CF. Afterall, it's not faster than asp.net according to several benchmarks. If milliseconds are so important to the customer, you're doing a disservice to them currently. On 6/6/06, dave wrote: > " and the vast majority of applications are better served with easier > development and maintenance than runtime performance. " > > Thus making it better for us but not the web site vistors, i just don't see > that as a good solution if it creates a noticable difference. > > ~Dave the disruptor~ > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Message: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=i:4:242748 Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/threads.cfm/4 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/lists.cfm/link=s:4 Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4 Donations & Support: http://www.houseoffusion.com/tiny.cfm/54
