Nearest neighbor looks pretty much the same for all three versions. Blinear and Bicubic show dramatic differences in the Java vs PS versions.
Rick...does Java have built in blur methods? I suggest trying a tie-in to the resize method. First resize it, then add in a very subtle blur. Then return THAT image as the thumbnail. What that should do is to smooth out the jaggies. You could also try resizing the image in 25% increments until you get close to the final size, then sample down to the final size. <!----------------//------ andy matthews web developer certified advanced coldfusion programmer ICGLink, Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 615.370.1530 x737 --------------//---------> -----Original Message----- From: Rick Root [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, December 08, 2006 10:25 AM To: CF-Talk Subject: Interpolation - Round 2 Okay it's true. Java's basic imaging sucks at making thumbnails: http://www.opensourcecf.com/imagecfc/thumbnail_test/index.html Compare the "100" compression version with the photoshop versions. They're about the same file size. But the photoshop ones look *WAY* better. time to start investigating JAI I guess! Rick ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Create robust enterprise, web RIAs. Upgrade & integrate Adobe Coldfusion MX7 with Flex 2 http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:263298 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
