>I'm simply saying that this contest devalues the overall work product
>because it expects that people would be willing to work towards a prize that
>they might not win.

Hmm, and yet when companies put out for bids on design work, the applicants 
will have to offer up designs for free in an attempt to win the bid. And that's 
true of more than just design. And, yes, I know *some* companies will pay 
applicants to bid but most don't. So it's common business practice to ask 
people to "work for free" in order to win a prize (a business deal).

I'm really surprised at how "up in arms" you are getting about a simple contest 
for an open source project. Several framework projects have asked people to 
design logos for free (Mach II recently adopted a new logo after a design 
contest; CFEclipse went thru a similar process some time back; Reactor ran a 
logo contest). Some of these projects have also held open contests for website 
design. Did you complain publicly about those as well? If not, why not? Is 
there something about the Fusebox project that upsets you more than those other 
projects?

As for devaluing work - my experience has been the opposite. People I know 
who've submitted work for free to community projects (in a number of 
communities that I belong to) have all gone on to get *more* paying work 
because of their free community work!

Sean

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Upgrade to Adobe ColdFusion MX7 
Experience Flex 2 & MX7 integration & create powerful cross-platform RIAs 
http:http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;56760587;14748456;a?http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2/?sdid=LVNU

Archive: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:269347
Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4

Reply via email to