Robertson-Ravo, Neil (RX) wrote: > There is absolutely no basis in this, why wouldn't you touch it?
Because I'm a firm believer in choice - and I find .NET restrictive and limiting. > CFML upon .NET would be the same as running CFML upon Java False. .NET and Java are very different. Platform independence is one of the MANY ways that they are different. > it would probably run > faster as well. Presumption. > Is it just a stupid "anti-Microsoft" stance? It is a pro-choice stance. > I would say you are in the minority, certainly in the circles of technical > fellows who understand and realise where .NET lies in the landscape.. You make it sound like I'm denying the existence of .NET. I'm fine with ..NET. If if helps you, then happy for you. I'm not denying that it can perform specific tasks. What I *AM* saying, (read this part carefully) is that it limits you in your choices once you invest in it. CFML, Java, PHP, and Ruby do not include this limitation, and also allow you to perform the same tasks that .NET does. So... why would I purposely chose to limit yourself when there are non-limiting alternatives available? > I would be interested to see understand why it would have zero interest... It's simple really: I enjoy freedom. -Jordan ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion MX7 and Flex 2 Build sales & marketing dashboard RIAâs for your business. Upgrade now http://www.adobe.com/products/coldfusion/flex2?sdid=RVJT Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:280143 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
