Karl,
Certainly FB coding methods are NOT obligatory - nor for everyone - thats
for sure. You opinions are as well valued. No problems there. I just find
your perspective quite interesting - as it seems so... contrary to sooo many
other folks. Maybe no one else other than you and Dave Watts has the
"loinal fortitude" to stand up and say so - tho Im sure there are many
others.
Its rather contrary also to quite a few peeps on these lists that - well
frankly - are not at all CF Beginners (I am a beginner - and I found FB was
quite helpful - but thats neither here nor there)
Maybe, ..... not to try and start a whole new "ADVANTA" methodology or
anything like that ... but maybe - since you guys find Fusebox to suck
monkey ass so bad, you could discuss some of the code | design methodologies
you and your team decided on that kicked FB's arse - up down and sideways.
Surely the community could benefit a great deal from a methodology thats so
far superior?
At least Dave Watts provides constructive criticism that discusses real life
examples where their situations arent conducive to FB style (though there is
also some debate on this as well - sorta) In any event - most of the anti -
FB arguments have held much water - as it were "Good Codes works fine all
by itself and no need for FB .... doesnt really get it.
So what were your alternatives??
What werkz better?
How would you improve the file naming conventions?
What would you keep?
Please tell me it sucks for a better reason the the file naming!!!? Also...
I dont recall there being a giant plea/demand/cry - to run out and re-write
everything one does or did in FB? .... and FAD? Javascript animations ...
now theres a FAD.
Stephen M. Aylor
iiinsurex
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Karl Simanonok" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: fusebox
>
>
> > Like I said: we've used Fusebox (you found proof), and having done so,
> > discovered that any benefits it may have are marginal at best. That
> > doesn't mean we're going to rewrite everything we've done in it! I've
> > still got old Perl code running from before CF was born (and somebody
> > might even ask me to write some more someday), but it doesn't mean I'm a
> > Perl fan of any kind.
> >
> > I forgot to acknowledge another Fusebox 'benefit' yesterday: since it
> > increases development time, you get to pad your clients' bills by using
> > it. ;)
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Karl S.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
