From: "Stephen M Aylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Certainly FB coding methods are NOT obligatory - nor for everyone - thats
> for sure. You opinions are as well valued. No problems there. I just find
> your perspective quite interesting - as it seems so... contrary to sooo many
> other folks. Maybe no one else other than you and Dave Watts has the
> "loinal fortitude" to stand up and say so - tho Im sure there are many
> others.
>
<checking loins for fortitude .... >
Too busy writing non-fusebox apps to discuss much.
It isn't an issue that seems all that necessary to consider.
Never got a job because of fusebox, never lost one because
of fusebox. It's just like the certification issue - no impact
within my intellectual horizon - so discussion of same just
doesn't consume much of my time or thinking.
What would attract my attention is if there was any
*reproducible* statististics that provided non-anectdotal
evidence that fusebox can be faster, more efficient than
some other methodology.
Maybe some people would have the time to construct a
scenario that works towards providing good data ...
(Maybe the data already exists ???)
Something like -- post a spec that is made available at
a specified time and then collect various solutions.
Then look at total work time, workflow, closeness to
specs, operational efficiency and any number of other
factors.
Were anyone to do such a study I would give it a close
read. If I found enough convincing 'stuff' that lead
to adopting fusebox as a standard best practice, then
I'd adopt it without any hesitation.
Until then I have work to do and not the time to
rigorously examine fusebox.
Does the new fusebox book have anything like the
above in it?
<stop checking loins ... er, ah ... well - end of message>
Pan - "why didn't I post this to cf_community?"
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists or send a message
with 'unsubscribe' in the body to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
