Naturally you wouldn't have access to another isolated box but no impact? None? That's amazing.
So I could have a VPS box inside (for example, TJ Maxx's network) and the theory is there would be no impact or security concerns for either party? Maybe I'm missing something your saying here, but that doesn't seem right. John [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----Original Message----- From: Dave Watts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2007 3:57 PM To: CF-Talk Subject: RE: Shared Hosting vs VPS > > Others having access to *their* VPS does not add to the security > > concerns of *your* VPS. > > I can't agree with that. There several things to be consider here. How > the network is setup, etc. But to say there's no impact is clearly > wrong. Jochem wrote that there's no impact with regard to security, and he's clearly right by any meaningful measurement. Having administrative access to one isolated server doesn't gain you any access to a separate isolated server, whether the two servers are physical or virtual. Dave Watts, CTO, Fig Leaf Software http://www.figleaf.com/ Fig Leaf Software provides the highest caliber vendor-authorized instruction at our training centers in Washington DC, Atlanta, Chicago, Baltimore, Northern Virginia, or on-site at your location. Visit http://training.figleaf.com/ for more information! ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| ColdFusion is delivering applications solutions at at top companies around the world in government. Find out how and where now http://www.adobe.com/cfusion/showcase/index.cfm?event=finder&productID=1522&loc=en_us Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/message.cfm/messageid:289239 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/CF-Talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.4
