TLDR: I wouldn't worry too much about graphical tools for either Git or Hg unless you have a funky deployment plan. Both have plugins for CFBuilder. I can tell you that Hg works.
I would like to add that I picked Hg over Git because I was able to get Hg working like I wanted within 20 minutes of download. Official Git, last time I checked, has horrible Windows support. I think there is a forked version that supports Windows but I don't think I'm exaggerating when I write that you are really taking a unnecessary, however small, risk if you work in a Windows environment. In reality, I don't think either Git or Hg is a bad choice. Heck, you can even pull from linux kernel repository using Hg. http://www.kernel.org/hg/linux-2.6/ Short: I recommend Hg due to a) easier install, b) easier to use, c) and better Windows support. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Want to reach the ColdFusion community with something they want? Let them know on the House of Fusion mailing lists Archive: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:332276 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/subscribe.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/unsubscribe.cfm
