Adam Reynolds wrote:
> Jeff,
> You keep on going on about other methodologies. Which particular other
> methodologies using CF are publicly available? You keep mentioning all
> these other methodologies, but can we at least compare them to Fusebox?
I believe you make a good point, in saying that Fusebox is a
publicly defined methodology.
But, I believe you missed my point. No single methodology will
fulfill every need. Fusebox is not the only methodology I have come
across. Once you weed out the 'programming at random' people,
You can probably find a different methodology for every programmer.
For other publicly available methodologies:
www.black-box.org
www.switch-box.org
Also I was told that 'www.litter-box.org' was going to define a methodology, but
the site seems blank, or broken, at the moment.
--
Jeff Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
AIM: Reboog711 | ICQ: 5246969 | Phone: 860-229-2781
--
Instant Cold Fusion 4.5 | ISBN: 0-07-213238-8
Due out 3rd Quarter 2001
--
DotComIt, LLC
database driven web data using ColdFusion, Lotus Notes/Domino
--
Half of the Alternative Folk Acoustic Duo called Far Cry Fly
http://www.farcryfly.com | http://www.mp3.com/FarCryFly
--
Promise me no dead end streets, and I'll guarantee we'll have a road
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm
Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
