The fusebox methodology has many benefits, and I really don't think it adds any time 
to the development cycle.  In fact, I'm pretty sure it helps speed up development.

One of the greatest advantages of the style is that you can modularize you code, and 
in doing so, you can assign pieces of your application to various developers without 
worrying about them stepping on each other's toes.

Another advantage is that because it is a documented approach to programming, the next 
programmers won't have to decipher your unique style in order to pick up where you 
left off.

Another advantage is that certain companies (such as mine) require it.  So if you 
don't do it, you're not going to get a job with certain companies.

Lastly, it's very simple to follow the programming flow of a fusebox app.  When 
something goes wrong, you simply search for the fuseaction in the index file and then 
you'll see right away all the templates in a single handy block that could be involved 
with the problem.

I'm sure the folks on the Fusebox list would be happy to help you more with this.

---mark


--------------------------------------------------------------
Mark Warrick
Phone: (714) 547-5386
Efax.com Fax: (801) 730-7289
Personal Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Personal URL: http://www.warrick.net 
Business Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Business URL: http://www.fusioneers.com
ICQ: 346566
--------------------------------------------------------------


> -----Original Message-----
> From: war ape [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 6:22 AM
> To: CF-Talk
> Subject: Fusebox
> 
> 
> 
> Whats the whole point of Fusebox?
> I don't see how it makes an application any less proprietary
> i i know it helps modularize an application for reuse, but how 
> does it help 
> make the application more understandable to other programmers?
> Most don't use fusebox, so right there its been made harder
> also i think it adds a dense layer of complexity to an application, 
> basically adding another 10-15% work to the appllication.
> I don't see that it does much that could not be achieved with a 
> standardized 
> naming convention.
> Sorry if i seem the philistine, but my mantra has always been simplicity, 
> simplicity is what makes an application more accessible to later 
> programmers
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to