Several people have thrown out the term 'CFObjects.'  But if you good read up on 
CFObjects it is not really fleshed out and certainly not thoroughly tested by 
different programmers on different types of projects. It is just a good starting point 
to make an object oriented methodology out of Cold Fusion programming.

What I like about Fusebox is it is the first methodology I have seen that specifically 
addresses the idiosyncrasies of web programming. The fact that it is geared for Cold 
Fusion is just a plus. Web programming is not the same as procedural programming, and 
although close it is not exactly the same as event-driven programming either.  
Does anyone know of any more 'researched' web programming methodologies?


At 09:47 AM 12/22/00 +0000, Adam Reynolds wrote:
>Jeff,
>You keep on going on about other methodologies. Which particular other
>methodologies using CF are publicly available? You keep mentioning all
>these other methodologies, but can we at least compare them to Fusebox?
>
>Fusebox is probably one of the best methodologies (if not the only public
>methodology) available for a ColdFusion developer. The book also covers a
>number of fundemental design elements that any CF'er should understand.
>EVEN if they don't do Fusebox.
>
>Adam
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From:   Jeffry Houser [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>Sent:   Thursday, December 21, 2000 1:47 PM
>To:     CF-Talk
>Subject:        Re: Fusebox
>
>
>
>"Warrick, Mark" wrote:
>
>> The fusebox methodology has many benefits, and I really don't think it
>adds any time to the development cycle.  In fact, I'm pretty sure it helps
>speed up development.
>>
>
>  Well, that has nothing to do w/ Fusebox.  Any programming methodology
>will offer
>this benefit.  The key is having one in place and sticking to it.
>
>
>>
>> One of the greatest advantages of the style is that you can modularize
>you code, and in doing so, you can assign pieces of your application to
>various developers without worrying about them stepping on each other's
>toes.
>>
>
>  See above.  This is not unique to fusebox.
>
>
>
>>
>> Another advantage is that certain companies (such as mine) require it. 
>So if you don't do it, you're not going to get a job with certain
>companies.
>>
>
>  If you are not a consultant, that is complete hogwash, I think. 
>Especially with today's job market.  Fusebox (or whatever methodology the
>company uses) should be more than
>willing to train on the methodology.  If you already know the language
>(What company
>doesn't have enough trouble finding people who know the language?),
>learning the
>coding practices should be easy enough.
>
>  I did one job, where the first thing they did was sit me down and
>outline the
>coding practices.  It took about a half hour sitting down with the lead
>developer.
>I took notes, and then followed them.  No problems.
>
>
>>
>> Lastly, it's very simple to follow the programming flow of a fusebox
>app.  When something goes wrong, you simply search for the fuseaction in
>the index file and then you'll see right away all the templates in a
>single handy block that could be involved with the problem.
>>
>
>  As I said previously, any methodology worth its salt should offer this. 
>If
>I don't know fusebox, then your app isn't going to be any easier to follow
>than
>some other unknown methodology.  (It probably will be easier to follow than
>random coding, though)
>
>--
>Jeff Houser | mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>AIM: Reboog711  | ICQ: 5246969 | Phone: 860-229-2781
>--
>Instant Cold Fusion 4.5  | ISBN: 0-07-213238-8
>Due out 3rd Quarter 2001
>--
>DotComIt, LLC
>database driven web data using ColdFusion, Lotus Notes/Domino
>--
>Half of the Alternative Folk Acoustic Duo called Far Cry Fly
>http://www.farcryfly.com | http://www.mp3.com/FarCryFly
>--
>Promise me no dead end streets, and I'll guarantee we'll have a road
>
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
        Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists

Reply via email to