Neo will run... well, anywhere. Verity (written in C, the launcher (easily ignored)) will not function, and certain low-level OS interactions components will not run, but it will run... for the most part.
I'm typing a more detailed message in between bug fixes. > -----Original Message----- > From: Vernon Viehe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 4:39 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: CFMX OS X [rant] > > > That's the impression I have as well (note, I'm not saying > anything official, it' just the impression I'm under) > > Since it runs on top of a J2EE server, it theoretically > should work, but it won't be supported by MM Tech Support. > But, if someone tries it, please let me know how it goes! > > Vernon Viehe > Community Manager > Macromedia, Inc. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Bryan Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 1:03 PM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: CFMX OS X [rant] > > > > > > actually I beleive it will run on OSX, but it will not be > > officially supported...just passing on > > what I have heard from folks in the know ;-) > > > > Bryan Stevenson > > VP & Director of E-Commerce Development > > Electric Edge Systems Group Inc. > > t. 250.920.8830 > > e. [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Macromedia Associate Partner > > www.macromedia.com > > --------------------------------------------------------- > > Vancouver Island ColdFusion Users Group > > Founder & Director > > www.cfug-vancouverisland.com > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Dick Applebaum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 12:30 PM > > Subject: CFMX OS X [rant] > > > > > > > <rant> > > > > > > Umm... very disappointed that MX does not run on OS X... I > > was hoping... > > > > > > At least as a developer platform, if not as a deployment platform. > > > > > > A Mac has some significant advantages for web developers. > > For example: > > > you can easily and inexpensively run multiple concurrent > > platforms (Win > > > 9x, Win NT, Win 200, Win MX, Linux, OS X, etc) to test the > > look and feel > > > of an application in these environments... you can do > this all on a > > > machine that costs under $800 and takes up less than15 > > cubic inches of > > > desk space.... > > > > > > I am told that is no business case for MM to release CFMX > for OS X? > > > > > > I read somewhere, that with the release of OS X, overnight, > > the Apple > > > logo was on more 'nix workstations than any other. > > > > > > Not to mention. that every Mac ships with OS X, > integrated: Apache, > > > Java, etc already installed and ready to use (also Perl and > > pHp). No > > > separate installs, service packs, downloads... it's all > > there... part of > > > OS X. > > > > > > I got the feeling that maybe MM looked at Apple's > > WebObjects (WO) as > > > competition (or vice versa)... but then the MM hookup > with IBM shows > > > (potentially) how two competitors can cooperate to the > > benefit of both > > > (and their customers). > > > > > > I think CFMX & WO would integrate nicely (Note, WO, for > > $700, includes > > > GUI programming/debugging interfaces, and an operational > > SQL database) > > > > > > Finally, CFMXOSXWO... what a natural for an acronym... > > it would be on > > > everyones' lips... > > > > > > </rant> > > > > > > > > > Dick > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
