That seems awfully contradictory. On the one hand you disagree, but on the other you acknowledge that there must surely be instances of what I described, but you haven't seen them. Well just how many CF applications being ported from CF 5 to CFMX have you looked at?
My comment was based on experience and confirmed by MM employees. It's not like I am making this shit up. Matt Liotta President & CEO Montara Software, Inc. http://www.montarasoftware.com/ V: 415-577-8070 F: 415-341-8906 P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -----Original Message----- > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 12:39 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > I can't say I agree there...I'm sure there are instances of this side > effect...it's just I haven't seen it yet. At the moment all our apps are > still CF5 code base aside from the current project. > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matt Liotta [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 1:45 PM > To: CF-Talk > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > It really depends on how your application is put together. If you followed > some of the standard ways CF applications were put together, then CFMX > will > smoke CF 5. However, if you had taken the time to write applications that > were designed to smoke every other application server on the market with > CF > 5, you are pretty much screwed with CFMX. > > Matt Liotta > President & CEO > Montara Software, Inc. > http://www.montarasoftware.com/ > V: 415-577-8070 > F: 415-341-8906 > P: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Stacy Young [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 10:42 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: RE: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > Really? Our CFMX smokes any of our CF5 installs! You sure you don't > have > > debug on? ;-) > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:27 AM > > To: CF-Talk > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > Yup now we're at cfmx which cf5 still is faster then though mx does > alot > > of > > neat things 5 doesn't. Maybe someday someone can make J2EE run a > little > > faster lol. > > > > Bill Wheatley > > Senior Database Developer > > Macromedia Certified Advanced Coldfusion Developer > > EDIETS.COM > > 954.360.9022 X159 > > ICQ 417645 > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Talk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Friday, July 12, 2002 11:21 AM > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > *sniff sniff* ahh, the good old CF3 days, back when there were a > > > zillion restrictions on cfoutput.... Pound signs everywhere.... > > > cfloops that counted slower than you saying the numbers.... > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: Zac Spitzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Date: Friday, July 12, 2002 9:14 am > > > Subject: Re: Storing Queries in Application Scope > > > > > > > Dave Watts wrote: > > > > >>Why can I not just reference my queries at > > > > >>application.[queryName].[value] throughout my application? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > You can. This is actually described near the bottom of the > > > > technote.I'm not > > > > > sure why the writer bothered with all that copying queries to > > > > arrays > > > > stuff > > > > > at the top. > > > > > > > > and the coding style is bad way to many #'s where they aren't need > and > > > > they don't lock! but it's cf 3.0 code :-) > > > > > > > > z > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com FAQ: http://www.thenetprofits.co.uk/coldfusion/faq Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists
