the internal system it's replacing is utter rubbish and a real pain
for operators. And it's because Google has such clean lines that the
bar has well and truly been raised as far as user expectation. But
Google isn't perfect for all situations (hence learning to open result
in new tab as part of my personal workflow).
two points:
the client can be completely useless when it comes to explaining what
they want, but they can be damn good at telling you what you're
providing isn't it.
There's a lot to be said for benevolent dictatorships. if a design is
signed off by two levels of management then if people aren't happy
they can take it up with *their* management and meanwhile I can get on
with fleshing out the next module.
so the trick is finding a design currently in use that can be pointed
at as a potential solution ("hey, it works for them, I reckon it'll
work for us"). Sometimes seeing it in action provides legitimacy to
those two important levels of management.
Andrew, got a personal favourite you like?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"cfaussie" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/cfaussie?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
