> with the introduction of CFC's will the use of <CFSCRIPT> diminish?
I would say the exact opposite! Now that I used CFCs, I use cfscript MORE. Much of my controller logic is defined using cfscript, as the actual behind the scenes tag based processing is stored within my CFCs. But as per already stated - depends on what I am writing - sometime layout says that using some big tags makes things easier to read - and sometimes using cfscript is just typing less characters than using tag based implementation. And now we have <cffunction> anything that is tag based, can be turned into a funtion at the drop of a hat. (my fave is turning cfthrow into a fuction I can call from within a cfc, and all exceptions thrown fro a cfc are the same type) As per performance - cfscriptt vs cfset and the rest. I don't really care. I'd rather spend my time working on performance in areas that really matter - database queries, algorithm analysis, data structure work, system design etc. ----------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 3094740 Safe From Bees [www.safefrombees.com] --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
