> You can see just from that that CFSCRIPT is faster
Interesting statement - ever thought of a career in politics ;-)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Steve Onnis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CFAussie Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:41 AM
Subject: [cfaussie] RE: Cf Programming Style
> Here is a simple one I just did
>
>
> <cfscript>
> for (i = 1; i LTE 1000000; i=i+1)
> {}
> </cfscript>
> 2047 ms
>
>
> <cfloop from="1" to="1000000" index="i">
>
> </cfloop>
> 484 ms
>
>
> You can see just from that that CFSCRIPT is faster
>
> This is on CFMX SP3 on Win2K Server SP3
>
> Steve
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gary Menzel
> Sent: Wednesday, July 02, 2003 10:34 AM
> To: CFAussie Mailing List
> Subject: [cfaussie] RE: Cf Programming Style
>
>
> > Has anyone bench tested this? :)
>
> Not that I know of, Nick - maybe some stuff done in CF Developers Journal.
>
> However, you know what release are like, all the benchmarks may change
> with the next upgrade.
>
> >From what I have read, I am lead to believe that the tag-based elements
> that equate to script-based elements result in the same Java code being
> generated.
>
> Any benchmark testing would have to be broken down into two parts - the
> compilation part and the execution part. My assumption being that the
> execution parts will be identical for mappable items between the two
> techniques on a CFMX platform.
>
>
> Gary Menzel
> IT Operations Brisbane -+- ABN AMRO Morgans Limited
> Level 29, 123 Eagle Street BRISBANE QLD 4000
> PH: 07 333 44 828 FX: 07 3834 0828
>
****************************************************************************
> If this communication is not intended for you and you are not an
authorised
> recipient of this email you are prohibited by law from dealing with or
> relying on the email or any file attachments. This prohibition includes
> reading, printing, copying, re-transmitting, disseminating, storing or in
> any other way dealing or acting in reliance on the information. If you
> have received this email in error, we request you contact ABN AMRO Morgans
> Limited immediately by returning the email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> and destroy the original. We will refund any reasonable costs associated
> with notifying ABN AMRO Morgans. This email is confidential and may
contain
> privileged client information. ABN AMRO Morgans has taken reasonable steps
> to ensure the accuracy and integrity of all its communications, including
> electronic communications, but accepts no liability for materials
> transmitted. Materials may also be transmitted without the knowledge of
ABN
> AMRO Morgans. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited its directors and employees do not
> accept liability for the results of any actions taken or not on the basis
> of the information in this report. ABN AMRO Morgans Limited and its
> associates hold or may hold securities in the companies/trusts mentioned
> herein. Any recommendation is made on the basis of our research of the
> investment and may not suit the specific requirements of clients.
> Assessments of suitability to an individual's portfolio can only be made
> after an examination of the particular client's investments, financial
> circumstances and requirements.
>
****************************************************************************
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
>
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
>
---
You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MX Downunder AsiaPac DevCon - http://mxdu.com/
