Sean - A very valid point. I'm starting to wonder if it's a thread issue.
I did try hitting the site while my 're-cache' was in effect, but it seemed to handle it without a problem. Mind you this was on dev. I should probably come in one weekend and do it on production (when nobody can see it if I reboot the server occasionally) Gotta love threading issues - I'm normally pretty careful with these things. Cheers, Mark ------------------------------------------------------------------ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ICQ: 3094740 Safe From Bees [ www.safefrombees.com ] Quoting Sean A Corfield <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On Jan 15, 2004, at 5:49 PM, Brendan Sisson wrote: > > We have seen similar issues in FarCry using 6.1 with our factory cfc's > > stored in the application scope. Every now and then we would get an > > error similar to what you are saying but it wasn't consistent, ie > > can't replicate the error everytime. > > > > Since moving these "high traffic" cfc's to the request scope, we > > haven't had the problem. > > Bear in mind that CFC instances that live in application scope are > effectively subject to the same locking rules as other data in > application scope - a stray identifier not declared with 'var' is all > it needs to trip over thread safety issues! > > Sean A Corfield -- http://www.corfield.org/blog/ > > Got Mach II? -- http://www.mach-ii.com/ > > > --- > You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia > http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004 > > > --- You are currently subscribed to cfaussie as: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe send a blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] MXDU2004 + Macromedia DevCon AsiaPac + Sydney, Australia http://www.mxdu.com/ + 24-25 February, 2004
